Are United’s Running Stats Really the Problem? Last Season’s Numbers Suggest Otherwise

AI-generated editorial illustration representing Michael Carrick and Manchester United players amid debate over the team's running statistics.

Manchester United’s poor running statistics have come under scrutiny after their difficult start to the season, but figures from last season suggest the explanation for their problems may not be as simple as a lack of effort.

BBC Sport analysis shows United were already among the Premier League’s lowest-ranked teams for distance covered and sprints during Michael Carrick’s successful first months in charge.

From Carrick’s appointment on 17 January until the end of the 2025/26 season, United collected 39 points from 17 Premier League matches.

No other club collected more over the same period.

Yet only four Premier League teams covered less distance than United during that run, while only two recorded fewer sprints.

The comparison is significant because United’s physical-output statistics have again been among the league’s poorest this season, while their results have deteriorated sharply.

The issue came into focus following the draw with Fulham.

Fulham covered 6.6 kilometres more than United during the match, prompting Gary Neville to criticise the physical level of Carrick’s side.

The difference was substantial, particularly during a poor period in which United struggled to impose themselves on the game.

But the longer-term figures complicate the argument that United simply need to run more.

Carrick’s side produced similarly low rankings for distance and sprinting last season while collecting points at an exceptional rate.

There is another notable comparison this season.

Manchester City have covered less total distance than United while winning all five of their opening Premier League matches.

None of that means physical intensity is irrelevant. Distance covered and sprint numbers can expose problems within individual performances, and United’s display against Fulham gave Neville plenty to criticise.

What the numbers do show is that low running totals are not automatically incompatible with winning football.

United managed it repeatedly last season.

The more important question may therefore be how effectively Carrick’s side are using their movement – when they press, where they run, how quickly they react to transitions and whether their structure allows those efforts to achieve anything.

United’s physical rankings have remained broadly poor.

Their results have not.

That difference suggests the search for what has gone wrong needs to extend beyond the number of kilometres covered.

Source

Was this worth reading? 1
Share This Story